linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: orion_nand: Improve error handling in orion_nand

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130609224544.GB3963@debian>
Date:	Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:45:44 +0200
From:	Emil Goode <emilgoode@...il.com>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com, andrew@...n.ch,
	Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@...ginia.edu>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: orion_nand: Improve error handling in
 orion_nand_probe

Hello,

Sorry for not responding earlier, I was away from my computer.
Thanks for the review, I will send a second version that applies
on top of Andy's patch and fix that typo in the change log.

Best regards,

Emil

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:15:22AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 10:27:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 08:15:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> >> >> What about another patch (that I guess should go first)  that converts
> >> >> printk to dev_* or pr_*?
> >>
> >> > Huh, what?  Those are two totally unrelated things.  Emil's patch is
> >> > a bug fix.
> >>
> >> To be precise his patch is bugfix and cleanup at once.
> >> My proposal is to add a clean up patch.
> >
> > The printk idea isn't a bad one, it's just totally unrelated to what
> > the patch is doing.
> 
> I don't agree with word 'totally'. It touches probe function and
> shuffles code there.
> 
> >  You can't just randomly tell people to do a
> > bunch of work for no reason.  "Good bugfix, but before we apply it
> > you have to mow my lawn."
> 
> In this particular case I didn't think it's a big deal to fix 3 printfs.
> Anyway, see patch in the next message.
> 
> 
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/