lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:52:33 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocky" <rjw@...k.pl>, "cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>, Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@...aro.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq:boost:Kconfig: Enable boost support at Kconfig On 10 June 2013 18:50, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:07:52AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >> > Enable/disable support for BOOST. New flag - CPU_FREQ_BOOST has been >> > defined for that. >> >> What's the reason for this? Why would you want to not compile-in the >> boosting code? > > I think that this flag could be removed and the "boost" could be > compiled-in permanently. > > Viresh, what is your opinion? Yes, Borislav is correct. I haven't actually reviewed these last patches as I saw lots of issues with first one :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists