[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20130610154202.34b634b7@amdc308.digital.local>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:42:02 +0200
From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocky" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>,
Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq:boost:Kconfig: Enable boost support at Kconfig
Hi Viresh,
> On 10 June 2013 18:50, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:07:52AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> >> > Enable/disable support for BOOST. New flag - CPU_FREQ_BOOST has
> >> > been defined for that.
> >>
> >> What's the reason for this? Why would you want to not compile-in
> >> the boosting code?
> >
> > I think that this flag could be removed and the "boost" could be
> > compiled-in permanently.
> >
> > Viresh, what is your opinion?
>
> Yes, Borislav is correct. I haven't actually reviewed these last
> patches as I saw lots of issues with first one :)
Ok, thanks :-)
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists