[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1370941408-29304-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:03:25 +0200
From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocky" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: "cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>,
Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] cpufreq:boost: CPU Boost mode support
This patch series introduces support for CPU overclocking technique
called Boost.
It is a follow up of a LAB governor proposal. Boost is a LAB component:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1484746/match=cpufreq
Boost unifies hardware based solution (e.g. Intel Nehalem) with
software oriented one (like the one done at Exynos).
For this reason cpufreq/freq_table code has been reorganized to include
common code.
Important design decisions:
- Boost related code is compiled-in unconditionally and disabled by default
The cpufreq_driver is responsibile for providing low_level_boost callback
- struct cpufreq_driver has been extended with boost related fields
- Boost sysfs attributies are seen only when cpufreq driver supports them.
They will not show up until either cpufreq_driver defines low_level_boost
callback or device tree's cpufreq "boost_mode" attribute is defined.
- No special spin_lock for Boost was created. The one from cpufreq_driver
was reused.
- Low level boost trigger function (*low_level_boost function callback) is
necessary to "glue" together acpi-cpufreq boost with software based one.
Tested at: HW:
Exynos 4412 3.10 linux
Exynos 4210 3.10 linux
Compile tested x86_64 defconfig (acpi) - help with HW (Intel Nehalem) test
needed
Two patches were abandoned (comparing to v1):
[PATCH 1/5] cpufreq: Define cpufreq_set_drv_attr_files() to add per CPU sysfs attributes
[PATCH 5/5] cpufreq:boost:Kconfig: Enable boost support at Kconfig
For detailed changelog please look into relevant patches
Lukasz Majewski (3):
cpufreq:boost: CPU frequency boost code unification for software and
hardware solutions
cpufreq:acpi:x86: Adjust the acpi-cpufreq.c code to work with common
boost solution
cpufreq:exynos:Extend Exynos cpufreq driver to support boost
framework
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 72 ++++++++++++++------------------------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 12 +++++++
5 files changed, 209 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists