[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1306102125410.22970@ionos>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:39:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/27] genirq: Split __irq_reserve_irqs from
irq_alloc_descs
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> /**
> - * irq_alloc_descs - allocate and initialize a range of irq descriptors
> - * @irq: Allocate for specific irq number if irq >= 0
> + * __irq_reserve_descs - reserve and initialize a range of irq descriptors
Did you even bother to run docbook ?
No you didn't. Otherwise you'd have noticed that documentation for
__irq_reserve_descs is not the right thing for a function named
__irq_reserve_irqs.
> + * __irq_reserve_descs - reserve and initialize a range of irq descriptors
The function only reserves a range of irq descriptors and does not
initialize them.
> +
> +/**
> + * irq_alloc_descs - allocate and initialize a range of irq descriptors
Again you document non matching function names.
> +int __ref
> +__irq_alloc_descs(int irq, unsigned int from, unsigned int cnt, int node,
> + struct module *owner)
Sloppy as usual along with a sucky changelog as usual.....
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists