linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] ARM: tegra30: clocks: Fix pciex clock registration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130611221709.8816.15602@quantum>
Date:	Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:17:09 -0700
From:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Jay Agarwal <jagarwal@...dia.com>
Cc:	linux@....linux.org.uk, thierry.reding@...onic-design.de,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com, ldewangan@...dia.com, olof@...om.net,
	hdoyu@...dia.com, pgaikwad@...dia.com, pdeschrijver@...dia.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	jtukkinen@...dia.com, kthota@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] ARM: tegra30: clocks: Fix pciex clock registration

Quoting Stephen Warren (2013-06-04 12:08:08)
> On 06/04/2013 12:57 PM, Jay Agarwal wrote:
> > Registering pciex as peripheral clock instead of fixed clock
> > as tegra_perih_reset_assert(deassert) api of this clock api
> > gives warning and ultimately does not succeed to assert(deassert).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jay Agarwal <jagarwal@...dia.com>
> > ---
> > Patch is based on remotes/gitorious_thierryreding_linux/tegra/next and should be applied on top of this.
> 
> For this change, Mike may as well apply it directly to the clock tree.
> Thierry can then pick it up when he rebases his tegra/next tree.
> 
> That said, I don't think you should need any of the
> TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE() entries; the PCIe driver should get its clocks
> from device tree now, and hence the driver name in the clock
> registration shouldn't be necessary. All of these TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE()
> entries should be removed en mass sometime soon with luck. So, can you
> simply leave the two TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE() entries untouched, rather
> than changing them?

Ping on this patch.  I can take it through my tree, but is there going
to be rework based on Stephen's comments?

Regards,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/