linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pwm: Fill in missing .owner fields

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK9yfHyUT7KUkY3g2WJ7XiisLL5mvJuenv=UEK_9OqwfF7s4Zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:05:18 +0530
From:	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: Fill in missing .owner fields

Hi Thierry,

On 12 June 2013 16:59, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> Some drivers don't set the .owner fields of the struct device_driver or
> struct pwm_ops, which causes the module usage count to become wrong.


Recently a patch [1] was added to solve this issue of missing .owner
fileds in struct platform_driver.
Probably something similar could be done for struct pwm_ops too?


[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2612961/

-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/