linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: palmas: enable all modes for SMPS10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130612141409.GE1403@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:14:09 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
	"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gg@...mlogic.co.uk" <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: palmas: enable all modes for SMPS10

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 02:12:07PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

> I think ff we really want to abstract this stuff then we should have
> the two different regulator SMPS10-OUT1 and SMPS-OUT2 as there is
> physically two pins in the device for output and controlled
> different way.

Yes, that seems like the most obvious thing here as far as I can tell
from the frankly fragmented and obscure information but given all the
confusion that seems to exist among the people working on the driver
it's really not clear if there's something else going on.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)