linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: palmas: enable all modes for SMPS10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bcb26ab704763c7ae7ef815b8fa0f652@slimlogic.co.uk>
Date:	Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:31:09 +0100
From:	gg@...mlogic.co.uk
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
	lgirdwood@...il.com, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, balbi@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: palmas: enable all modes for SMPS10

On 2013-06-12 15:14, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 02:12:07PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> 
>> I think ff we really want to abstract this stuff then we should have
>> the two different regulator SMPS10-OUT1 and SMPS-OUT2 as there is
>> physically two pins in the device for output and controlled
>> different way.
> 
> Yes, that seems like the most obvious thing here as far as I can tell
> from the frankly fragmented and obscure information but given all the
> confusion that seems to exist among the people working on the driver
> it's really not clear if there's something else going on.

What about the case where they are inputs? For bus power?

Graeme

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/