linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: palmas: enable all modes for SMPS10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130612145126.GG1403@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:51:26 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	gg@...mlogic.co.uk
Cc:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
	lgirdwood@...il.com, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, balbi@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: palmas: enable all modes for SMPS10

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:31:09PM +0100, gg@...mlogic.co.uk wrote:
> On 2013-06-12 15:14, Mark Brown wrote:

> >Yes, that seems like the most obvious thing here as far as I can tell
> >from the frankly fragmented and obscure information but given all the
> >confusion that seems to exist among the people working on the driver
> >it's really not clear if there's something else going on.

> What about the case where they are inputs? For bus power?

So the current flow can change direction here?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)