lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1371056055.24587.140661243104889.29DDEEB4@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:54:15 +0100
From:	Simon Brown <lists@...c.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Accessing more than 2GB of memory with a 32 bit kernel

Hello,

For the sake of an old prototype peripheral I'm using a non PAE 32 bit
x86 kernel and I'm having trouble accessing memory above 2 GB. The
system has 4GB installed and all is well with a PAE kernel. 

I'm obviously expecting to lose some memory due to memory mapped devices
but I wasn't expecting to lose 2GB. Instead I'm suspecting a BIOS bug.
The system reports:
free -m
             total       used       free     shared    buffers    
             cached
Mem:          2012        491       1521          0         40       
277

The mtrr table looked odd so I enabled sanitisation:
[    0.000000] original variable MTRRs
[    0.000000] reg 0, base: 2GB, range: 2GB, type UC
[    0.000000] reg 1, base: 0GB, range: 4GB, type WB
[    0.000000] reg 2, base: 4GB, range: 2GB, type WB
[    0.000000] total RAM covered: 4096M
[    0.000000] Found optimal setting for mtrr clean up
[    0.000000]  gran_size: 64K  chunk_size: 64K         num_reg: 2     
lose cover RAM: 0G
[    0.000000] New variable MTRRs
[    0.000000] reg 0, base: 0GB, range: 2GB, type WB
[    0.000000] reg 1, base: 4GB, range: 2GB, type WB

I don't understand the gap in the new table.

The motherboard is an Asus P5K with an IntelĀ® P35 chipset. I'm using the
ubuntu lucid kernel (2.6.32) but the problem is also present with the
ubuntu precise kernel.
I'm at the limit of my understanding, can anyone advise how to debug
further?

Thanks,

Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ