[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XKeRjpH1+ytjMfLuGGqQ5VVub22n=V+UpV=jBCD4LLHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:06:45 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com>,
Bing Zhao <bzhao@...vell.com>,
Ashok Nagarajan <asnagarajan@...omium.org>,
Paul Stewart <pstew@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: mmc: dw_mmc: Always go to STATE_DATA_BUSY from STATE_DATA_ERROR
Seungwon,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com> wrote:
>> > There are two solutions we have applied.
>>
>> I'm a little confused. Have you already applied one or both of the
>> solutions you list below, or are you proposing them as alternates to
>> the patch I submitted?
> Yes, first one already has been applied.
> I wanted to introduce our fix. Did you try to test with these fixes?
I'm coming back to this after being quite distracted for a while.
I'm a little confused in that you said that your first fix was already
applied. I don't see it anywhere. Did you mean that you've already
applied it locally, or that it's applied in some git tree somewhere?
If so, can you point me to it?
If this hasn't been sent out anywhere, perhaps you could send out
official patches?
I don't have the failing unit myself, so we'll have to get Bing to try
the patches. You are suggesting that we try applying both of your
patches, right?
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists