linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] RFC: mmc: dw_mmc: Always go to STATE_DATA_BUSY from STATE_DATA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <001801ce6c20$6ba39900$42eacb00$%jun@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:36:13 +0900
From:	Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
To:	'Doug Anderson' <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	'Jaehoon Chung' <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
	'Chris Ball' <cjb@...top.org>,
	'Will Newton' <will.newton@...il.com>,
	'Bing Zhao' <bzhao@...vell.com>,
	'Ashok Nagarajan' <asnagarajan@...omium.org>,
	'Paul Stewart' <pstew@...omium.org>,
	'Olof Johansson' <olof@...om.net>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] RFC: mmc: dw_mmc: Always go to STATE_DATA_BUSY from
 STATE_DATA_ERROR

On Thursday, June 13, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Seungwon,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com> wrote:
> >> > There are two solutions we have applied.
> >>
> >> I'm a little confused.  Have you already applied one or both of the
> >> solutions you list below, or are you proposing them as alternates to
> >> the patch I submitted?
> > Yes, first one already has been applied.
> > I wanted to introduce our fix. Did you try to test with these fixes?
> 
> I'm coming back to this after being quite distracted for a while.
> 
> I'm a little confused in that you said that your first fix was already
> applied.  I don't see it anywhere.  Did you mean that you've already
> applied it locally, or that it's applied in some git tree somewhere?
> If so, can you point me to it?
> 
> If this hasn't been sent out anywhere, perhaps you could send out
> official patches?
Currently, it has just applied for some projects, not official patch.
> 
> I don't have the failing unit myself, so we'll have to get Bing to try
> the patches.  You are suggesting that we try applying both of your
> patches, right?
Did you test the patch?
I wonder that both are good for your side.

Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
> 
> -Doug

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/