linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51B9AB18.30801@ti.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:20:56 +0300
From:	Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@...com>
To:	Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@...ballogic.com>
CC:	<gg@...mlogic.co.uk>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<sameo@...ux.intel.com>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <balbi@...com>,
	<peter.ujfalusi@...com>, <t-kristo@...com>, <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032

On 06/13/2013 11:17 AM, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:44 PM, <gg@...mlogic.co.uk 
> <mailto:gg@...mlogic.co.uk>> wrote:
> >
> > On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From: Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk <mailto:gg@...mlogic.co.uk>>
> >>>
> >>> The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by
> >>> the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to
> >>> reference the TWL6032 class and name the registers to twl6032 in 
> line with
> >>> an actual released chip name to avoid confusion.
> >>>
> >>> Currently there is no users of TWL6025 in the code.
> >>
> >>
> >> Given that the chip exists even if not widely distributed it seems as
> >> well to keep the twl6025 references in there at least in the device ID
> >> table - it won't do any harm to people using the twl6032 name and might
> >> help someone who happens to pick up an old board for whatever reason.
> >
> >
> > I do not think any "old boards" exist, it really was a limited run!
> >
> > Graeme
>
> Hello Mark, Graeme,
>
> Taking in account that:
> - there is no hardware to test twl6025, testing is not possible;
> - there is no documentation for twl6025, and if there are any changes 
> to twl6032 is not known;
> - twl6032 is available, and in production, twl6025 is not even found 
> on ti.com <http://ti.com>
>
> So, what do you think, can this change be accepted?
> <http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt>
Sorry for spamming - had problems with mail server.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/