| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2067345.uNWy6pBO6B@flatron>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:14:25 +0200
From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...omium.org>,
ilho215.lee@...sung.com, eunki_kim@...sung.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: exynos: reorder xyz_irq_unmask() so future patch can ack
On Wednesday 12 of June 2013 10:33:18 Doug Anderson wrote:
> This patch does nothing but reorder the functions to improve the
> readability of a future patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c | 52
> ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 26
> insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
IMHO just moving _ack() above _mask() (or _unmask()) would be enough,
without touching _mask() and _unmask() in this patch, but have my
Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
Best regards,
Tomasz
P.S. I think you might have missed linux-arm-kernel and linux-samsung-soc
in recipients list of this series.
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c index c29a28e..c0729a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos_wkup_irq_ids[]
> = { { }
> };
>
> -static void exynos_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +static void exynos_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd)
> {
> struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
> struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d = bank->drvdata;
> @@ -61,13 +61,22 @@ static void exynos_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data
> *irqd) spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
>
> mask = readl(d->virt_base + reg_mask);
> - mask &= ~(1 << irqd->hwirq);
> + mask |= 1 << irqd->hwirq;
> writel(mask, d->virt_base + reg_mask);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->slock, flags);
> }
>
> -static void exynos_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +static void exynos_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +{
> + struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
> + struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d = bank->drvdata;
> + unsigned long reg_pend = d->ctrl->geint_pend + bank->eint_offset;
> +
> + writel(1 << irqd->hwirq, d->virt_base + reg_pend);
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
> {
> struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
> struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d = bank->drvdata;
> @@ -78,21 +87,12 @@ static void exynos_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data
> *irqd) spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
>
> mask = readl(d->virt_base + reg_mask);
> - mask |= 1 << irqd->hwirq;
> + mask &= ~(1 << irqd->hwirq);
> writel(mask, d->virt_base + reg_mask);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->slock, flags);
> }
>
> -static void exynos_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
> -{
> - struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
> - struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d = bank->drvdata;
> - unsigned long reg_pend = d->ctrl->geint_pend + bank->eint_offset;
> -
> - writel(1 << irqd->hwirq, d->virt_base + reg_pend);
> -}
> -
> static int exynos_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *irqd, unsigned int
> type) {
> struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
> @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ err_domains:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void exynos_wkup_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +static void exynos_wkup_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd)
> {
> struct samsung_pin_bank *b = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
> struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d = b->drvdata;
> @@ -279,13 +279,22 @@ static void exynos_wkup_irq_unmask(struct irq_data
> *irqd) spin_lock_irqsave(&b->slock, flags);
>
> mask = readl(d->virt_base + reg_mask);
> - mask &= ~(1 << irqd->hwirq);
> + mask |= 1 << irqd->hwirq;
> writel(mask, d->virt_base + reg_mask);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->slock, flags);
> }
>
> -static void exynos_wkup_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +static void exynos_wkup_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +{
> + struct samsung_pin_bank *b = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
> + struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d = b->drvdata;
> + unsigned long pend = d->ctrl->weint_pend + b->eint_offset;
> +
> + writel(1 << irqd->hwirq, d->virt_base + pend);
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos_wkup_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
> {
> struct samsung_pin_bank *b = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
> struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d = b->drvdata;
> @@ -296,21 +305,12 @@ static void exynos_wkup_irq_mask(struct irq_data
> *irqd) spin_lock_irqsave(&b->slock, flags);
>
> mask = readl(d->virt_base + reg_mask);
> - mask |= 1 << irqd->hwirq;
> + mask &= ~(1 << irqd->hwirq);
> writel(mask, d->virt_base + reg_mask);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->slock, flags);
> }
>
> -static void exynos_wkup_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
> -{
> - struct samsung_pin_bank *b = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
> - struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d = b->drvdata;
> - unsigned long pend = d->ctrl->weint_pend + b->eint_offset;
> -
> - writel(1 << irqd->hwirq, d->virt_base + pend);
> -}
> -
> static int exynos_wkup_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *irqd, unsigned int
> type) {
> struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists