lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51B93038.9010202@huawei.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:36:40 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	<koverstreet@...gle.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] cgroup: use kzalloc() and list_del_init()

On 2013/6/13 5:03, Tejun Heo wrote:
> There's no point in using kmalloc() and list_del() instead of the
> clearing variants for trivial stuff.  We can live dangerously
> elsewhere.  Use kzalloc() and list_del_init() instead and drop 0
> inits.
> 

Do you mean we prefer list_del_init() than list_del() in general? Then
in which cases do we prefer list_del()?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ