[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51BAADE8.2040501@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:45:12 +0800
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
CC: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, trenn@...e.de,
yinghai@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org, mina86@...a86.com,
gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com,
lwoodman@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com,
prarit@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [Part3 PATCH v2 2/4] mem-hotplug: Skip LOCAL_NODE_DATA pages
in memory offline procedure.
Hi Dave,
On 06/14/2013 01:17 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 06/13/2013 06:03 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
>> +static inline bool is_local_node_data(struct page *page)
>> +{
>> + return (unsigned long)page->lru.next == LOCAL_NODE_DATA;
>> +}
>
> page->lru is already in a union. Could you please just add a new entry
> to the union with a nice associated comment instead of reusing it this way?
>
You mean add a new entry to the union in page structure ?
Hum, seems a good idea. :)
And as you know, NODE_INFO, SECTION_INFO, ... , they all reuse page->lru.
So I need to modify the associated code too. This is easy to do, and I can
do it in the next version soon.
Thanks. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists