[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1BAFE6F6C881BF42822005164F1491C33EC35C68@DBDE04.ent.ti.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:38:41 +0000
From: "Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.hebbar@...com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
CC: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"zonque@...il.com" <zonque@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
"Bedia, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@...com>,
"Rajashekhara, Sudhakar" <sudhakar.raj@...com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] rtc: omap: add rtc wakeup support to alarm events
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 03:51:43, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> "Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.hebbar@...com> writes:
>
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 16:55:17, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 23:11:22, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> > Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@...com> writes:
> >> >
> >> > > On some platforms (like AM33xx), a special register (RTC_IRQWAKEEN)
> >> > > is available to enable Wakeup feature for Alarm Events.
> >> > >
> >> > > Since new platforms/Boards are now added through DT only, this feature
> >> > > is supported via DT property only.
> >> >
> >> > > Platforms using such IP should add the property "ti,has_irq_wake_enb"
> >> > > in rtc DT node.
> >> >
> >> > This is a property of the IP, not the board. Can't you detect this
> >> > based on the revision of the IP?
> >>
> >> Here is what I found out till now.
> >>
> >> 1. rtc-omap driver is used by Davinci, OMAP-1/2 & AM33xx SoC.
> >>
> >> 2. Only AM33xx soc rtc ip has revision register (& populated). Older OMAP
> >> Or davinci doesn't have this register.
> >>
> >> 3. AFAIK, this was the reason why Afzal used platform_device_id &
> >> of_device_id->data method to detect new versions (commit
> >> 9e0344dcc225fe1a0e8b8af9ff7df44ec4613580)
> >>
> >>
> >> So now either
> >> a. I can follow the same method and add new member to omap_rtc_devtype & add a new compatible in
> >> omap_rtc_of_match in rtc-omap.c
> >>
> >> or
> >>
> >> b. use dt property to indicate existence of above property.
> >>
> >>
> >> Kindly let me know your opinion about the same.
> >
> > Any update on this. I have patch ready for both the choices. Waiting for your ok to send
>
> I think (a) is better.
Ok. I will add the property using a new DT compatibility.
>
> The driver should always do a device_init_wakeup(dev, true), *except*
> for devtypes that don't have this feature.
"wakeup capable" and "irq-wake-enable-for-alarm-event" are different
For "irq-wake-enable-for-alarm-event", I will add a new DT compability.
However, wakeup capable notification is done in another patch using the a
DT property "ti,wakeup_capable".
The reason for using a dt property is specified below
commit fa5b07820fe3a0fc06ac368516e71f10a59b9539
Author: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Date: Wed Oct 27 15:33:05 2010 -0700
rtc: omap: let device wakeup capability be configured from chip
init logic
The rtc-omap driver currently hardcodes the RTC wakeup
capability to be "not capable". While this seems to be true for
existing OMAP1 boards which are not wired for this, the
DA850/OMAP-L138 SoC, the RTC can always be wake up source from
its "deep sleep" mode.
So I cannot directly add device_init_wakeup(dev, true), inside driver code.
So, I added a DT property
>
> Kevin
>
>
Regards,
Gururaja
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists