lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0000013f4319cb46-a5a3de58-1207-4037-ae39-574b58135ea2-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:32:11 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
To:	Roman Gushchin <klamm@...dex-team.ru>
cc:	penberg@...nel.org, mpm@...enic.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mgorman@...e.de, rientjes@...gle.com, glommer@...allels.com,
	hannes@...xchg.org, minchan@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: Avoid direct compaction if possible

On Fri, 14 Jun 2013, Roman Gushchin wrote:

> Slub tries to allocate contiguous pages even if memory is fragmented and
> there are no free contiguous pages. In this case it calls direct compaction
> to allocate contiguous page. Compaction requires the taking of some heavily
> contended locks (e.g. zone locks). So, running compaction (direct and using
> kswapd) simultaneously on several processors can cause serious performance
> issues.

The main thing that this patch does is to add a nocompact flag to the page
allocator. That needs to be a separate patch. Also fix the description.
Slub does not invoke compaction. The page allocator initiates compaction
under certain conditions.

> It's possible to avoid such problems (or at least to make them less probable)
> by avoiding direct compaction. If it's not possible to allocate a contiguous
> page without compaction, slub will fall back to order 0 page(s). In this case
> kswapd will be woken to perform asynchronous compaction. So, slub can return
> to default order allocations as soon as memory will be de-fragmented.

Sounds like a good idea. Do you have some numbers to show the effect of
this patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ