[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130615100935.GA2477@mithrandir>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:09:36 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/omap: change "!CONFIG_FB_OMAP2" to "!FB_OMAP2"
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 08:48:22PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
> ---
> Untested. Perhaps the first test that people with access to the relevant
> hardware might do, is to test _before applying this patch_ with FB_OMAP2
> set. Perhaps this negative dependency isn't needed at all. Or is it
> obvious?
I don't think you need access to hardware to test this. Checking that
the dependencies work properly (using menuconfig for example) and
build testing should be enough.
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig
> index 09f65dc..45875a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>
> config DRM_OMAP
> tristate "OMAP DRM"
> - depends on DRM && !CONFIG_FB_OMAP2
> + depends on DRM && !FB_OMAP2
> depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM
> depends on OMAP2_DSS
> select DRM_KMS_HELPER
Regardless of whether the dependency is needed or not, the typo should
be fixed, so:
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists