lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda2isXNCrd8Auiv7bNtKYBH3cwRx6idebMDbDPZrbqfJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:22:38 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org list" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC 10/10] irqchip: Make versatile fpga irq driver a generic chip

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is an RFC patch to convert the versatile FPGA irq controller driver
>>>> to use generic irq chip. It builds on the series that extends the
>>>> generic chip code to allow a linear irq domain to contain one or more
>>>> generic irq chips so that each interrupt controller doesn't need to hand
>>>> code the generic chip setup.
>>>>
>>>> I've written this as a proof of concept to see if the new generic irq
>>>> code does what it needs to. I had to extend it slightly to properly
>>>> handle the valid mask used by the versatile FPGA driver.
>>>>
>>>> Tested on QEMU, but not on real hardware.
>>>
>>> Is this the same as the one I tested previously?
>>>
>>> If it need re-testing please push a branch and I'll take it
>>> for a spin.
>>
>> Yes, it's the same, but if you can test the branch I would appreciate
>> it. I've done some heavy rework on the irqdomain code that makes
>> everything simpler, but also makes it likely that I've broken
>> something.
>>
>> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux.git irqdomain/test
>
> It still works like a charm on the Integrator/AP.
> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

BTW here is the new hwirq output in /proc/interrupts and it's really nice:

root@...egrator:/proc cat interrupts
           CPU0
 17:       1845       pic   1  uart-pl010
 22:      13716       pic   6  timer
 24:          0       pic   8  rtc-pl030
Err:          0

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ