[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZcc8a1zG446jKRDyKr2Cpu2tV1J52gwSOhL2NcUDyAwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:56:36 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...omium.org>,
Ilho Lee <ilho215.lee@...sung.com>,
Eunki Kim <eunki_kim@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pinctrl: exynos: ack level-triggered interrupts
before unmasking
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
>> A level-triggered interrupt should be acked after the interrupt line
>> becomes inactive and before it is unmasked, or else another interrupt
>> will be immediately triggered. Acking before or after calling the
>> handler is not enough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...omium.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Greatly simplified using Tomasz's suggestion of irqd_get_trigger_type
>> - Moved acking out of the bank spinlock since since it's not needed.
>> - Linus W. has already applied parts 1 and 2, so not resending.
>
> Thanks, this v2 version applied with Tomasz ACK.
As noted this thing exploded due to patch fuzzing.
Could you respin this on top of my "devel" branch?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists