[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130617235527.GA18652@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:55:27 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pc@...f.org,
oatilla@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/19] bh1770glc: added input device interface
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 01:54:26AM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > > > > The driver generates an event in /dev/input/ under the name
> > > > > 'bh1770'. It's a switch event where is reported '0' or '1'
> > > > > whenever the sensor detects something crossing the threshold.
> > > > >
> > > > Doesn't this mean that this driver is now an "input" driver, so it
> > > > shouldn't be using the odd sysfs api, and should move to the
> > > > drivers/input/ directory tree?
> > >
> > > The driver has also lots of interfaces in
> > > sysfs that are used from userspace, like proximity value and
> > > ambient light value.
> > >
> > > What the input interface provides is just one of the features
> > > from the driver. Shall I move it anyway?
> >
> > Hm, why not make it an iio driver instead? That way you get input and
> > sysfs all together.
>
> I'll do my best to get the hardware I need, then, so that once I
> do it I'll do it fully correct :)
>
> Then, just ignore this patches and I'll come later with a new
> patchset.
>
> But I still wonder: this is a combined proximity/ambient light
> sensor, where exactly should I move it? Is it correct to create a
> new directory for combined sensors?
Ask the iio developers, they will know best here.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists