[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1371546510.3252.224.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:08:30 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eilon Greenstien <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
Alex Rosenbaum <alexr@...lanox.com>,
Avner Ben Hanoch <avnerb@...lanox.com>,
Or Kehati <ork@...lanox.com>, sockperf-dev@...glegroups.com,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: poll/select low latency socket support
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 11:58 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
> select/poll busy-poll support.
>
> */
> -static inline u64 ll_end_time(struct sock *sk)
> +static inline u64 ll_sk_end_time(struct sock *sk)
> {
> - u64 end_time = ACCESS_ONCE(sk->sk_ll_usec);
> -
> - /* we don't mind a ~2.5% imprecision
> - * sk->sk_ll_usec is a u_int so this can't overflow
> - */
> - end_time = (end_time << 10) + sched_clock();
> + return (ACCESS_ONCE(sk->sk_ll_usec) << 10) + sched_clock();
> +}
>
This is the fourth time you try to introduce an overflow in this code.
(same for ll_end_time())
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists