[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C02478.7020708@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:12:24 +0300
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eilon Greenstien <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
Alex Rosenbaum <alexr@...lanox.com>,
Avner Ben Hanoch <avnerb@...lanox.com>,
Or Kehati <ork@...lanox.com>, sockperf-dev@...glegroups.com,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: poll/select low latency socket support
On 18/06/2013 12:08, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 11:58 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
>> select/poll busy-poll support.
>>
>
>
>> */
>> -static inline u64 ll_end_time(struct sock *sk)
>> +static inline u64 ll_sk_end_time(struct sock *sk)
>> {
>> - u64 end_time = ACCESS_ONCE(sk->sk_ll_usec);
>> -
>> - /* we don't mind a ~2.5% imprecision
>> - * sk->sk_ll_usec is a u_int so this can't overflow
>> - */
>> - end_time = (end_time << 10) + sched_clock();
>> + return (ACCESS_ONCE(sk->sk_ll_usec) << 10) + sched_clock();
>> +}
>>
>
> This is the fourth time you try to introduce an overflow in this code.
>
> (same for ll_end_time())
sorry,
Please review the rest of the patch to see if you have any other comments.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists