[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C0826B.4060101@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:53:15 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: J Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
CC: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
ldewangan@...dia.com, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, swarren@...dia.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
gg@...mlogic.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] MFD: Palmas: Add SMPS10_BOOST feature
On 06/18/2013 04:03 AM, J Keerthy wrote:
> The SMPS10 regulator is not presesnt in all the variants
> of the PALMAS PMIC family. Hence adding a feature to distingush
> between them.
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/palmas.c b/drivers/mfd/palmas.c
> + match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(of_palmas_match_tbl), &i2c->dev);
> +
> + if (match) {
> + features = (unsigned int *)match->data;
> + palmas->features = *features;
> + } else {
> + return -ENODATA;
> + }
I think it's more common to do the error-checking first. That way, the
success-case code doesn't need an indent:
match = of_match...(...);
if (!match)
return -ENODATA;
features = ...;
palmas->features = *features;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists