[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C30B95.4010406@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:33:01 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
CC: "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
"gg@...mlogic.co.uk" <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"ian@...mlogic.co.uk" <ian@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: palmas: model SMPS10 as two regulators
On Thursday 20 June 2013 07:20 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 20 June 2013 04:22 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> On Thursday 20 June 2013 02:07 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> SMPS10 has two outputs OUT1 and OUT2 and have one input IN1.
>>> SMPS10-OUT2 is connected to SMPS10-IN1 and can be configured either
>>> in BOOST mode or BYPASS mode. regulator_enable of SMPS10-OUT2 configures
>>> it in BOOST mode. For BYPASS mode regulator_allow_bypass() API can be
>>> used. SMPS10-OUT1 is connected to SMPS10-OUT2 and can be enabled using
>>> regulator_enable().
>>>
>>> Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>> include/linux/mfd/palmas.h | 9 ++++----
>>> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
>>> b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
>>> index 3ae44ac..7004bab 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
>>> @@ -97,7 +97,12 @@ static const struct regs_info palmas_regs_info[] = {
>>> .ctrl_addr = PALMAS_SMPS9_CTRL,
>>> },
>>> {
>>> - .name = "SMPS10",
>>> + .name = "SMPS10_OUT1",
>>> + .sname = "smps10-out2",
>>> + .ctrl_addr = PALMAS_SMPS10_CTRL,
>>> + },
>>> + {
>>> + .name = "SMPS10_OUT2",
>>> .sname = "smps10-in",
>>>
>> This sequence can create regulator to be never register.
>> In probe, we register regulator from 0 to max_id.
>> Here smps10-out1 comes first and see the supply as smps10-out2 which is not
>> registered yet and so will fail with PROBE_DEFER
>> When again it tries, the same issue.
> hmm.. But I was able to get (regulator_get) *SMPS10_OUT1* without any issue
> during my testing. From looking at the code, I couldn't see *sname* being used
> anywhere.
We used the sname as
pmic->desc[id].supply_name = palmas_regs_info[id].sname;
However, how you have populated your dt?
Have you added like
smps10-out2-supply = <&SMPS10_OUT2>
for the palmas regualtor -dt.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists