[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1306201314160.2063-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:19:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
cc: tony@...mide.com, <balbi@...com>, <ruslan.bilovol@...com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Suspend USB Host controller on bus suspend
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> As the omap-ehci controller driver needs to do some additional work to put
> >> itself into suspend/resume and make sure it is resumed to process an interrupt,
> >> we need to be able to override irq, bus_suspend, and bus_resume handlers. This
> >> provision is done in patch 3.
> >
> > Do you still need to override these things if you do the controller
> > suspend at the right time?
> >
>
> At least not for bus_suspend and bus_resume. We will still need to override the irq
> handler though. But, if we can take care of this generically in the ehci_irq handler (i.e. make
> sure controller is not suspended while accessing it) then we don't need such override
> for irq.
I don't think you need to override anything. The high-level interrupt
handler usb_hcd_irq() will avoid calling ehci_irq() when the
HCD_HW_ACCESSIBLE flag isn't set. All you will need to do in
ehci-omap.c is call synchronize_irq() after ehci_suspend() returns and
before turning off the clocks.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists