lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1306201319580.2063-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date:	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:25:31 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
cc:	Chao Xie <xiechao.mail@...il.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>,
	Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] USB: initialize or shutdown PHY when add or remove
 host controller

On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:

> > In fact, the PHY setting and handling is related to platform or SOC,
> > and for different SOC they can
> > have same EHCI HCD but they PHY handling can be different.
> > Omap'a case is the example, and i think some other vendors may have
> > silimar cases.
> > From above point, It is better to leave the PHY initialization and
> > shutdown to be done by each echi-xxx driver.
> > 
> > So Alan and Felipe
> > What are your ideas about it?
> 
> If we have so many exceptions, then sure. But eventually, the common
> case should be added generically with a flag so that non-generic cases
> (like OMAP) can request to handle the PHY by themselves.
> 
> Alan ?

I don't have very strong feelings about this; Felipe has much more
experience with these things.

However, when the common case is added into the core, the simplest way
to indicate that the HCD wants to handle the PHY(s) by itself will be
to leave hcd->phy set to NULL or an ERR_PTR value.

One important thing that hasn't been pointed out yet: When we move
these calls into the core, the same patch must also remove those calls
from the glue drivers that currently do set hcd->phy.  And it must make
sure that the glue drivers which handle the PHY by themselves do not
set hcd->phy.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ