[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1371754078.18733.106.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:47:58 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] tracing/perf: perf_trace_buf/perf_xxx hacks.
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 12:35 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/20/13 12:23 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > I ran this:
> >
> > perf stat --repeat 100 -- perf bench sched pipe > /tmp/perf-bench-sched.{before, after}
>
> You want to compare:
> perf stat --repeat 100 -p 1 -- perf bench sched pipe
>
> so that event is tagged to pid 1 and not the perf-bench workload.
I guess I'm a bit confused. What's the significance of measuring pid 1
(init)?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists