linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio MIPS/OCTEON: Add a driver for OCTEON's on-chip GPIO pins.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51C34F28.403@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:51:20 -0700
From:	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio MIPS/OCTEON: Add a driver for OCTEON's on-chip GPIO
 pins.

On 06/20/2013 11:43 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 11:27 -0700, David Daney wrote:
>> On 06/20/2013 11:18 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 11:10 -0700, David Daney wrote:
>>>> Sorry for not responding earlier, but my e-mail system seems to have
>>>> malfunctioned with respect to this message...
>>> []
>>>> On 06/17/2013 01:51 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>>>> +static int octeon_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +       struct octeon_gpio *gpio = container_of(chip, struct octeon_gpio, chip);
>>>>>> +       u64 read_bits = cvmx_read_csr(gpio->register_base + RX_DAT);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +       return ((1ull << offset) & read_bits) != 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> A common idiom we use for this is:
>>>>>
>>>>> return !!(read_bits & (1ull << offset));
>>>>
>>>> I hate that idiom, but if its use is a condition of accepting the patch,
>>>> I will change it.
>>>
>>> Or use an even more common idiom and change the
>>> function to return bool and let the compiler do it.
>>>
>>
>> ... but it is part of the gpiochip system interface, so it would have to
>> be done kernel wide.
>
> Not really.  It's a local static function.

... which we generate a pointer to, and then assign that pointer to a 
variable with a type defined in the gpiochip system interface.  So If we 
do what you suggest, the result is:

   CC      drivers/gpio/gpio-octeon.o
drivers/gpio/gpio-octeon.c: In function 'octeon_gpio_probe':
drivers/gpio/gpio-octeon.c:113:12: warning: assignment from incompatible 
pointer type [enabled by default]



>
>> Really I don't like the idea of GPIO lines having Boolean truth values
>> associated with them.  Some represent things that are active-high and
>> others active-low.  Converting the pin voltage being above or below a
>> given threshold to something other than zero or one would in my opinion
>> be confusing.
>
> No worries, just offering options.  Your code, your choice.
>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/