| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130621073301.GA19353@balto.lan> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:33:01 +0200 From: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org> To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Declare memcpy config as static On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 08:40:00AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Fabio Baltieri wrote: > > Fix sparse warnings: > > > > drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:81:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_phy' was not declared. Should it be static? > > drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:95:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_log' was not declared. Should it be static? > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org> > Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> > > I guess this would be dependent on recent ste_dma40 patches so best way is > Linus's tree, right? Yes, but I'm not sure Linus is going to send a third pull request for dma40 so maybe I should just resend my last two dma40 patches for arm-soc directly. Thanks for the Ack. Fabio -- Fabio Baltieri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists