[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1371786990.2776.137@driftwood>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:56:30 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Paul Clements <paul.clements@...eleye.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paul.clements@...eleye.com, nbd-general@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nbd: correct disconnect behavior
On 06/19/2013 04:09:18 PM, Paul Clements wrote:
> Currently, when a disconnect is requested by the user (via
> NBD_DISCONNECT
> ioctl) the return from NBD_DO_IT is undefined (it is usually one of
> several error codes). This means that nbd-client does not know if a
> manual disconnect was performed or whether a network error occurred.
> Because of this, nbd-client's persist mode (which tries to reconnect
> after
> error, but not after manual disconnect) does not always work
> correctly.
>
> This change fixes this by causing NBD_DO_IT to always return 0 if a
> user
> requests a disconnect. This means that nbd-client can correctly either
> persist the connection (if an error occurred) or disconnect (if the
> user
> requested it).
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Clements <paul.clements@...eleye.com>
Is _that_ what it was?
(Guy who wrote the busybox NBD client and never did quite understand
the disconnect/reconnect behavior.)
Acked-by: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Rob--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists