[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <51C7A6D2.8060709@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:54:26 +0900
From: jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: max77693: Add max77693 regualtor driver.
Hi,
On 2013년 06월 22일 00:19, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:03:26PM +0900, Jonghwa Lee wrote:
>> This patch adds new regulator driver to support max77693 chip's regulators.
>> max77693 has two linear voltage regulators and one current regulator which
>> can be controlled through I2C bus. This driver also supports device tree.
>
> This is fine but doesn't have a binding document which is needed for new
> DT bindings.
>
I'd like to add binding document to max77693 mfd's but it is still in progress
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/9/221). I think I can updates it when the patch
is merged. Do you think I have to wait for merging? Or just add document under
regulator/ this time ,and then move it to mfd/ later? Which one do you think better?
> A comment in the is_enabled() function explaining that more than one bit
> might be set (or replacing it with the generic function) would also be
> good.
Yes, the charger regulator needs two bits for checking enabling. I'll add the
comment about it.
Thanks,
Jonghwa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists