[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPM31RKrvY4zVRQBKnaQjdH0ROO3nAvPn5biP0O3ogmfubuXbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 04:06:52 -0700
From: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
jkosina@...e.cz, Clark Williams <clark.williams@...il.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>, keescook@...omium.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Resend patch v8 06/13] sched: compute runnable load avg in
cpu_load and cpu_avg_load_per_task
> AFAICT, the RT tasks activity is already taken into account by
> decreasing the cpu_power that is used during load balance like in the
> find_busiest_queue where weighted_cpuload is divided by cpu_power.
>
Yes. RT tasks used to be handled as having a very-large weight [e.g.
2*nice(-20)] but now we just scale cpu-power for how much non-RT time
there is available.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists