linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpomdnEgDcAExoyN1b4vohHNEg3NDH1mM8NWG8gQoPvff+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:40:27 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11

On 24 June 2013 16:29, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:

> In your original series that patch was the last one.  What made you change your
> mind and put it in front?

I initially thought that this one would break git bisect (code would
compile, but would fail) for platforms whose code I have fixed in
this patchset.

But that is true only for failure cases, otherwise code would work as
normal.

And hence kept this at the top this time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/