linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1662523.HdXbLYrd2q@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:45:15 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11

On Monday, June 24, 2013 04:40:27 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 June 2013 16:29, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> 
> > In your original series that patch was the last one.  What made you change your
> > mind and put it in front?
> 
> I initially thought that this one would break git bisect (code would
> compile, but would fail) for platforms whose code I have fixed in
> this patchset.
> 
> But that is true only for failure cases, otherwise code would work as
> normal.
> 
> And hence kept this at the top this time.

Well, it should go last.  Also I'd prefer to apply it directly.

Please check my comment in there too.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/