lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C93E7B.30709@st.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jun 2013 07:53:47 +0100
From:	Srinivas KANDAGATLA <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, kernel@...inux.com,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Gallimore <stephen.gallimore@...com>,
	Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@...com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] ARM:STixxxx: Add STixxxx platform and board support

On 24/06/13 18:54, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:37:56AM +0100, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>
>>
>> Thankyou all for reviewing the v3 patches.
>>
>> This patch-set adds basic support for STMicroelectronics STixxxx SOCs
>> which includes STiH415 and STiH416 with B2000 and B2020 board support.
>>
>> STiH415 and STiH416 are dual-core ARM Cortex-A9 CPU, designed for use in
>> Set-top-boxes. The SOC support is available in mach-stixxxx which contains
>> support code for STiH415, STiH416 SOCs including the generic board support.
>>
>> The reason for adding two SOCs at this patch set is to show that no new
>> C code is required for second SOC(STiH416) support.
>>
>> This patch-set only contains the SOC support, all the driver support for
>> this platform are submitted to respective mailing lists.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think these are looking quite reasonable, and I am ready to apply them
> to 3.11.
> 
> However, I have one bikeshed comment. I find the name of the platform to be
> awkward. Would you mind naming it mach-sti instead?
Am OK to rename them,
But, I see the patches on arm-soc for-next branch.

Thanks,
srini


> 
> 
> -Olof
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ