[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130625105135.GF21579@rric.localhost>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:51:35 +0200
From: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] perf: Add persistent event facilities
On 25.06.13 11:37:06, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:24:39AM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > I also see 'pers_' not as an optimum since it could be mixed-up easily
> > with 'perf_'. Maybe we take 'persist_' instead?
>
> Yep, although it reads wrong:
>
> perf_add_persist_event
We could use persist_ as prefix for static functions and use the long
versions for the interface only.
But all this is a bit bikeshedding. I am sure we find something.
-Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists