[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130625152941.GD4855@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:29:41 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] perf: Add persistent event facilities
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:51:35PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 25.06.13 11:37:06, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:24:39AM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > I also see 'pers_' not as an optimum since it could be mixed-up easily
> > > with 'perf_'. Maybe we take 'persist_' instead?
> >
> > Yep, although it reads wrong:
> >
> > perf_add_persist_event
>
> We could use persist_ as prefix for static functions and use the long
> versions for the interface only.
>
> But all this is a bit bikeshedding. I am sure we find something.
How about
perf_add_pevent?
It is nice and short, although maybe too short but "pevent" is almost
like a special term and the name shows that it is a special type of
event, i.e. a p-event.
:-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists