[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130625161428.GG21579@rric.localhost>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:14:28 +0200
From: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] perf: Add persistent event facilities
On 25.06.13 17:29:41, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> How about
>
> perf_add_pevent?
>
> It is nice and short, although maybe too short but "pevent" is almost
> like a special term and the name shows that it is a special type of
> event, i.e. a p-event.
Fine with me, though it's more for internal usage. There is also use
of it as name for event pointers. And, it is used in perf tools as
event parser structure. But otherwise its ok.
-Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists