[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C9BDB2.7060905@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:56:34 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] perf tools: allow non-matching sample types
On 6/24/13 7:16 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Sample types need not be identical to determine
> the sample id from the event. Only the position
> of the sample id needs to be the same.
>
> Compatible sample types are ones in which the bits
> defined by PERF_COMPAT_MASK are the same.
> 'perf_evlist__config()' forces sample types to be
> compatible on that basis.
Something is still missing to support different sample_types for events.
Consider the case (S/W event + tracepoint):
perf record -e cs -c1 -e sched:sched_switch -a -- sleep 1
perf script
This patch addresses the sample_type mismatch error message, but I get
no event samples in the output. Besides the usual header I get:
No trace sample to read. Did you call 'perf record -R'?
It's a 16-cpu box with 5 VMs running. I know there should be at least a
few samples in 1 second.
Stephane: are you looking at allowing sample_types per event?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists