[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C9BEA1.5000205@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:00:33 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] perf tools: fix ppid in thread__fork()
On 6/24/13 7:16 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> ppid should be assigned to the parents pid. Note
> 'thread__fork()'s only caller 'machine__process_fork_event()'
> ensures that the parents pid is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/thread.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/thread.c b/tools/perf/util/thread.c
> index e3d4a55..93f3eab 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/thread.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/thread.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ int thread__fork(struct thread *self, struct thread *parent)
> if (map_groups__clone(&self->mg, &parent->mg, i) < 0)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - self->ppid = parent->tid;
> + self->ppid = parent->pid_;
Confused. My patch uses parent->pid and that it what I see in acme's
perf/core branch. When did this become parent->tid?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists