[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130625191654.GH4855@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:16:54 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] perf, persistent: Kernel updates for perf tool
integration
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 07:57:29PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> But what options there are to detach the event from all processes and
> make it persistent?
Something like this:
ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DETACH, 0);
I guess this could simply set the persistent flag so that the rest of
the perf code knows not to destroy event buffers etc.
I don't have an idea about the reattaching though because you don't have
a file descriptor there.
Maybe for that we could really use the sys_perf_event_open() with flags
set to PERF_FLAG_PERSISTENT to note that we want to reattach to the
persistent event instead of opening a new one.
Something to that effect...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists