[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130626081223.GB21788@rric.localhost>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:12:23 +0200
From: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] perf, persistent: Kernel updates for perf tool
integration
On 25.06.13 21:16:54, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 07:57:29PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > But what options there are to detach the event from all processes and
> > make it persistent?
>
> Something like this:
>
> ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DETACH, 0);
>
> I guess this could simply set the persistent flag so that the rest of
> the perf code knows not to destroy event buffers etc.
>
> I don't have an idea about the reattaching though because you don't have
> a file descriptor there.
>
> Maybe for that we could really use the sys_perf_event_open() with flags
> set to PERF_FLAG_PERSISTENT to note that we want to reattach to the
> persistent event instead of opening a new one.
We get a new fd by opening the persistent event with the syscall.
There would be 2 new ioctls:
ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DETACH, 0);
ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ATTACH, 0);
This would be fine and reuses existing infrastructure.
-Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists