[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C9F8B6.1010505@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 01:38:22 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/MCE: Update MCE severity condition check
On 06/25/2013 10:01 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> The SDM talks about "non-affected" logical processors, but perhaps we
>> can call this an "unaffected" thread?
>
> "unaffected" sounds a bit more natural (but close enough to the wording in
> the SDM that people should see the connection).
Yup - "unnatural" is precisely the term that describes my feeling when I
read the original description :)
Thanks,
Naveen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists