[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130626091808.GA18468@gchen.bj.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 05:18:08 -0400
From: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/MCE: Update MCE severity condition check
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 04:31:23PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:31:23 +0000
> From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
> To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Chen Gong
> <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> CC: "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/MCE: Update MCE severity condition check
>
> > The SDM talks about "non-affected" logical processors, but perhaps we
> > can call this an "unaffected" thread?
>
> "unaffected" sounds a bit more natural (but close enough to the wording in
> the SDM that people should see the connection).
>
> -Tony
If this patch is OK, would you please help to update it when merging
it? Thanks very much.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists