[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130625202742.16593.74528.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 01:57:43 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
walken@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, sbw@....edu, fweisbec@...il.com,
zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 14/45] sched/rt: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to
prevent CPU offline
Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able
to depend on disabling preemption to prevent CPUs from going offline
from under us.
Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going
offline, while invoking from atomic context.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 01970c8..03d9f38 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include "sched.h"
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
int sched_rr_timeslice = RR_TIMESLICE;
@@ -28,7 +29,9 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart sched_rt_period_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
if (!overrun)
break;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
idle = do_sched_rt_period_timer(rt_b, overrun);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
}
return idle ? HRTIMER_NORESTART : HRTIMER_RESTART;
@@ -547,6 +550,7 @@ static int do_balance_runtime(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
int i, weight, more = 0;
u64 rt_period;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
weight = cpumask_weight(rd->span);
raw_spin_lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
@@ -588,6 +592,7 @@ next:
raw_spin_unlock(&iter->rt_runtime_lock);
}
raw_spin_unlock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
return more;
}
@@ -1168,6 +1173,10 @@ static void yield_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task);
+/*
+ * Must be called within get/put_online_cpus_atomic(), to prevent CPUs
+ * from going offline from under us.
+ */
static int
select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
{
@@ -1561,6 +1570,8 @@ retry:
return 0;
}
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
+
/* We might release rq lock */
get_task_struct(next_task);
@@ -1611,6 +1622,7 @@ retry:
out:
put_task_struct(next_task);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
return ret;
}
@@ -1630,6 +1642,7 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
if (likely(!rt_overloaded(this_rq)))
return 0;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
for_each_cpu(cpu, this_rq->rd->rto_mask) {
if (this_cpu == cpu)
continue;
@@ -1695,6 +1708,7 @@ skip:
double_unlock_balance(this_rq, src_rq);
}
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
return ret;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists