[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130625202755.16593.67819.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 01:57:55 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
walken@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, sbw@....edu, fweisbec@...il.com,
zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 15/45] rcu: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU
offline
Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able
to depend on disabling preemption to prevent CPUs from going offline
from under us.
In RCU code, rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs() checks if a CPU is offline,
while being protected by a spinlock. Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic()
APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline, while invoking from atomic context.
Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index cf3adc6..caeed1a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -2107,6 +2107,8 @@ static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, int (*f)(struct rcu_data *))
rcu_initiate_boost(rnp, flags); /* releases rnp->lock */
continue;
}
+
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
cpu = rnp->grplo;
bit = 1;
for (; cpu <= rnp->grphi; cpu++, bit <<= 1) {
@@ -2114,6 +2116,8 @@ static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, int (*f)(struct rcu_data *))
f(per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu)))
mask |= bit;
}
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
+
if (mask != 0) {
/* rcu_report_qs_rnp() releases rnp->lock. */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists