[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <51CB1A5902000078000E0D82@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:44:09 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Ben Guthro" <benjamin.guthro@...rix.com>
Cc: "Gang Wei" <gang.wei@...el.com>,
<tboot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"Rafaell J . Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/tboot: Fail extended mode reduced
hardware sleep
>>> On 26.06.13 at 16:06, Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@...rix.com> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c
> @@ -273,7 +273,8 @@ static void tboot_copy_fadt(const struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt)
> offsetof(struct acpi_table_facs, firmware_waking_vector);
> }
>
> -static int tboot_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_control, u32 pm1b_control)
> +static int tboot_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_control, u32 pm1b_control,
> + u8 extended)
I don't see why this couldn't remain "bool" - the only complain was
that ACPI CA shouldn't use it.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists